Cognitive vs Non-Cognitive Language
For the exam, you would want to know at least the following about cognitive and non-cognitive language.
Cognitive language expresses facts about the world.
As John Hick puts it, ‘We can define a cognitive (or informative or indicative) sentence as one that is either true or false’ (1990: 89).
Non-cognitive language is language that does anything else, e.g.
expressing feelings
sharing opinions
giving commands
There is a debate about whether religious language is cognitive or non-cognitive.
Thomas Aquinas argues that religious language is cognitive.
However, he explains ‘names [...] do indeed signify the divine substance and are predicated of God substantivally, but [...] they fall short in their representation of Him’ (ST I, q. 13, art. 2).
He means that religious language does refer to God, and can even speak of Him truthfully, but we must always remember that our language is not adequate to describe God completely.
A.J. Ayer claims that religious language attempts to be cognitive, but fails at it.
He argues out that ‘to say that “God exists” is to make a metaphysical utterance which cannot be either true or false’ (1936: 120).
Since true cognitive language is verifiable in practice or principle, and religious language is not, it fails as cognitive language, and becomes nonsense instead.
R.B. Braithwaite argues that religious language is non-cognitive.
He claims that ‘the meaning of a religious assertion is given by its use in expressing the asserter’s intention to follow a specified policy of behaviour’ (1955: 16).
He means that when people use Christian language, they are not describing the world, but rather their intention to live as a follower of Christ; it is more like taking the Oath of Allegiance than explaining how the universe works.
Sources:
Aquinas, Thomas. n.d. 'New English Translation of St. Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae (Summa Theologica)', trans. Alfred J. Freddoso <https://www.freddoso.com/summa-translation/TOC.htm>
Ayer, A.J. 1936 [1971]. 'Language Truth and Logic' (Penguin)
Braithwaite, R.B. 1955. 'An Empiricist's View of the Nature of Religious Belief' (Cambridge)
Hick, John. 1990. 'Philosophy of Religion', 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall)